7 followers

100 daily readers

rank of 435

Horror Horror - by Michelle-Gellar

[ March 2009 ] [ May 2009 ]

A one-way admission to Palookaville, "Fighting" stars up-and-comer Channing Tatum as a kid with a accomplished and a abandoned right, and resurrects two old Hollywood standbys -- '40s action dramas and graffiti-splattered, pre-Giuliani New York. This helps accomplish the ambience in administrator Dito Montiel's ham-fisted ball feel as accustomed as its plot, although Terrence Howard's credible Christopher Walken clothing qualifies as something new. Pic's loser-triumphant plotline should leave auds at ringside moderately happy.

Montiel (who debuted with the 2006 fest beloved "A Guide to Recognizing Your Saints") is aback on accustomed accommodation in New York, although it's beneath the New York of today than the one in which he grew up. That makes it feel no added accurate than if it had been created on a Hollywood lot (the midtown locations called accept to accept acquired some headaches).

Around these oh-so-mean streets lumbers Alabama boy Shawn MacArthur (Tatum), who has the concrete mannerisms and adrift attending of a abandoned guy: an billowing wifebeater, an disability to accumulate annihilation buttoned and a absolute abounding of books he tries to advertise down the artery from Radio City-limits Music Hall. There, he's beggared by a backpack of artery wretches beneath the arguable apply of Harvey Boarden (Howard).

Watching Shawn cold-cock his Fagin's gang, Harvey recognizes that Shawn is a accomplished fighter and -- brainstorm the accompaniment -- Harvey is affiliated to an underground, bare-knuckle angry arrangement that involves Wall Artery knuckleheads, Korean transvestites, Tong warlords, designer-knockoff merchants and Bronx bodega owners. The accomplished city, essentially. It takes all of three fights -- one of which he wins by banging a Russian's arch adjoin a bubbler bubbler -- for Shawn to become the better actionable allure in town.

Of course, the adulterous admiral that be wish Shawn to yield a dive -- adjoin extreme-fighting brilliant Evan Hailey (Brian White), who was a affiliate of Shawn's father's angry aggregation aback in Alabama (imagine the coincidence). They abhorrence anniversary other. Yield a dive? We'll see about that.

For all the absolute affectation of "Fighting" -- the cockeyed, faux-verite shooting, the lurches in storytelling, the abridgement of appearance development, a apish crisis amid Shawn and his ambitious adherent Zulay (Zulay Henao) and Tatum's dopey-charming thing--"Fighting's" not so bad. The Walken access on Howard wasn't a antic -- he plays Harvey as too civilized, too gentle, a guy who enunciates aggregate a bit too clearly, and all the while you're apprehensive if he's traveling to draft like a manhole cover. Even if he never does, he imposes a faculty of suspense. Harvey's nemeses -- played by Anthony DeSando, Luiz Guzman and Roger Guenveur Smith (who's aswell accomplishing Walken!) -- are apparent by contrast, admitting White's Evan is alluringly hateful.

The fights are edge-of-your-seat kinetic, and coordinator Mike Gunther has formed a lot of acceptable angry moves into Shawn's technique. He may attending like a bum, but he fights like a academy boy.

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Michelle-Gellar - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

"The Soloist "Robert Downey Jr. and Jamie Foxx

April 26th 2009 01:50

One of the a lot of difficult things for a filmmaker to achieve is to ability a ball that provides affecting achievement after resorting to apparent manipulation. Director Joe Wright has appropriately far accomplished this twice, with a accomplished adjustment of Pride and Prejudice and a adjustment of Atonement. Perhaps Keira Knightley (who was in those movies but is not in this one) is his brood or maybe Wright's talents are not able-bodied ill-fitted for this adjustment of Steve Lopez's true-life book. Whatever the case, this motion annual strikes abundant amiss addendum to accumulate it out of the must-see category. It's not harder to accept why Paramount pulled The Soloist from its aboriginal pre-Oscar December 2008 aperture for the beneath aggressive affliction of backward April - absolutely simply, this is not Oscar ability material.

The Soloist recounts the alternation amid Los Angeles Times columnist Steve Lopez (Robert Downey Jr.) and a abandoned man by the name of Nathaniel Ayers (Jamie Foxx). If Steve is aboriginal fatigued to Nathaniel, it's because of music accepting played by the closing on a violin with alone two strings. After Steve learns that Nathaniel was already enrolled in Julliard, a cavalcade is born. The two absorb time calm and Steve becomes bedeviled with accouterment a bigger activity for Nathaniel - accepting a new apparatus for him, accepting him off the artery and into a shelter, accouterment him with a music abecedary (Tom Hollander), and alignment a recital. The botheration is that Nathaniel is afflicted with schizophrenia and his moments of accuracy appear and go. At times, he can authority conversations with Steve. On added occasions, he becomes aloof and sometimes violent.

The botheration with The Soloist is that, while Wright shows admirable abstemiousness in assuming the alternation amid the two principals and does not abatement into the allurement of afterward a "movie of the week" blueprint about brainy illness, there is little affecting resonance in the story. The ambit amid the admirers and the characters is such that it becomes difficult to become affianced in the cine on a akin added than the intellectual. One ability altercate that Shine went too far down the feel-good path, but there's no abstinent its ultimate ability to arouse; The Soloist is afflicted with a abridgement of passion. There adventure lacks a able trajectory; it meanders, acutely borderline of absolutely what it wants to do and say and area it wants to go.

There are times during The Soloist if Wright is accusable of injecting too abundant of himself into the proceedings. On several occasions, Wright's stylistic choices assume to be added a case of a filmmaker assuming off than employing the a lot of able storytelling devices. For example, if Nathaniel is bottomward into carelessness during a flashback, the camera becomes afraid and there are abundant accelerated cuts. The soundtrack food multiple, overlapping voices. The cold is to allure the eyewitness to participate in the unhinging of Nathaniel's mind, a first-person angle of schizophrenia. Unfortunately, it feels bogus and contrived. A agnate animadversion can be fabricated about the arena in which the awning is abounding with colors during a agreeable interlude. It looks like a computer awning saver or the affectionate of affair one ability apprehend from abecedarian experimentation.

Whatever faults may be begin with Wright's access or the screenplay's structure, there's no catechism that Robert Downey Jr. and Jamie Foxx acquire their salaries. To the admeasurement that The Soloist is annual seeing, it's to acquaintance the alternation amid these two performers, both of whom absolutely actualize their characters. The accent of the Downey Jr./Foxx activating to the cine is a lot of axiomatic if one or both is missing from a arena - the acuteness drops off noticeably. With beneath accomplisher actors, one suspects The Soloist ability accept appear alarmingly abutting to unwatchability, or at atomic the amateurishness of Reign Over Me.

Perhaps the a lot of absorbing casting best in the cine is that, for scenes set on Los Angeles' Skid Row, Wright adopted to blur on area and use the abandoned as extras. This gives abounding of those scenes a faculty of verisimilitude. It makes the plight of the abandoned added agitating and provides a angle of why so abounding abandoned accept to reside on their own, out of arcade carts, abroad from shelters. This is alone a subtext of The Soloist, but it's an able one - added effective, in fact, than the capital story.

As one ability apprehend from a "based on a authentic story" motion pictures, some of the facts accept been adapted to fit the needs of a screenplay. (For example, in absolute life, Steve Lopez is appropriately married, not afar as he is in the movie.) The absolute Lopez has maintained, however, that corners were not cut in the representation of Nathaniel and the appearance in the blur is an authentic mirror of his friend. As a book, Lopez's annual of his accord with Nathaniel is compelling; it is appreciably beneath so in cine form. Abundant of the story's altruism comes from Lopez's writing, and that is absent in the cine (despite casual voiceover excerpts). The Soloist is neither adverse nor inept, but it is abnormally inert. Of all the things I ability accept expected, abrogation the amphitheater abundantly aloof about either of the characters was not one of them, yet that is what happened.

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Michelle-Gellar - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

Our "Earth"

April 23rd 2009 10:07

April 22, 2009 | There's no catechism that Disney's attributes blur "Earth" is admirable to attending at: A coffee-table book in documentary form, it archive the movements of three beastly families -- a set of polar-bear parents and their two cubs; a mother albatross and her baby; and a bulge bang and her dogie -- as they attempt to survive in a apple that's alteration all too rapidly, acknowledgment to mankind. The directors, Alastair Fothergill and Mark Linfield, the filmmakers abaft the BBC television alternation "Planet Earth," apperceive absolutely what to put in and what to leave out in agreement of visuals. Helicopter shots abduction august chill and arid textures, with all their modern-art cracks and fissures; the asinine alliance ball of a bird of paradise strikes a agreeable note; and, in one decidedly arresting and agreeable shot, a leash of lionesses attending up briefly from their bubbler hole, all three axis their active simultaneously, like choreographed showgirls. The movie's images sometimes accomplish us amend our own beheld confidence: Although we anticipate of arctic bears' coats as white, adjoin the whiteness of Chill snow, they're in actuality a abundant aureate yellow.

The bulletin that comes through in these images, helped forth by James Earl Jones' narration, is affable but stern: Our planet is a admirable abode abounding with beauty, and for our adolescent creatures' account as able-bodied as our own, we'd bigger stop fucking it up -- although Jones doesn't use those exact words. "Earth" -- the antecedent absolution from a new Disney analysis called, artlessly enough, Disneynature -- is a regal-looking picture, to the point of getting a little sterile. You may acquisition yourself adage "Wow!" affluence of times, after anytime getting decidedly moved, admitting the actuality that the filmmakers address, if alone glancingly, the acrid absoluteness that in nature, animals don't generally reside a continued and blessed life. Fothergill and Linfield are acutely alert about beastly death: For example, a white wolf chases down a adolescent caribou, and although the cine treats the predator's following like a car-chase arena in an activity movie, the caribou loses -- the filmmakers cut the arena just at the point area the wolf moves in for the kill, so we're absolved the afterimage of the adolescent animal's adversity (and the wolf's blood-soaked feast). Elsewhere, a pride of lions tackles a adult albatross beneath awning of black -- we see them ascend over him, about playfully, but we don't see what accordingly happens next.

I accept alloyed animosity about that ultra-judicious approach: On the one hand, I don't decidedly charge or wish to see a wolf disturbing into a caribou carcass, and I wouldn't wish to see Disney administer that on little kids, either. (The account is rated G.) On the added hand, there's something a little coy about the way the camera turns abroad at just the appropriate moment, as Jones' account does a brusque about-turn against cheerier subjects. I'm not abiding what the band-aid is; it's accessible that "Earth" tries to awning too abundant advice in too little time, and the picture's accent ability be smoother if Fothergill and Linfield didn't accept to cross so abounding brusque accouterment amid nature's inherent animality and its appropriately basic beauty.

So if you're bringing little kids to see "Earth," brace yourself for the assured catechism of what happens to the adolescent albatross who becomes afar from his assemblage and tries to chase -- by branch off in the amiss direction. (The cine doesn't appear appropriate out and acquaint us, but as we see the little guy in continued shot, ambling through a parched, abandoned amplitude of the Kalahari Desert, we all apperceive the answer.) The affecting boredom of "Earth" is conceivably added a accountability than a strength: If we're declared to feel some alikeness with our adolescent creatures, we're by itself traveling to feel some anguish if a adolescent animal's activity is cut abbreviate -- and activity that little bit of anguish is a admeasurement of how, as animal beings, our minds and hearts work, not a abnegation of how attributes works. (Animals eat added animals, and there's annihilation PETA, or any of us, can do to stop it.)

But there's annihilation in "Earth" that's as affective as the afterimage of the mother penguin "grieving" for her banty in "March of the Penguins." You can acclaim "Earth" for not jerking tears. On the added hand, an casual breach isn't such a bad thing. "Earth" about got one out of me if the ancestor arctic bear, attenuated from traveling too continued after food, realizes he's not traveling to bolt the walrus he's been eyeing. He lies down, exhausted, on the ice and -- well, it looks as if he's traveling to sleep, but it's bright he's headed for the big sleep. He wouldn't be in this asperity if all-around abating hadn't so acutely afflicted his habitat, as the cine makes clear. You may not cry for the arctic bear. But "Earth" at atomic suggests that we allotment albatross for his plight.

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Michelle-Gellar - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

recommend 17 Again

April 22nd 2009 08:08

[ Click here to read more ]

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Michelle-Gellar - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

Dragonball Evolution Movie Review

April 19th 2009 13:56

A pre-titles prologue rapidly outlines details of an ancient battle for the soul of planet Earth by Lord Piccolo (James Marsters) and his beastly cohort, Oozaru (Ian Whyte) -- a clash the world has blissfully forgotten

[ Click here to read more ]

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Michelle-Gellar - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

May 2009

16 Posts

April 2009

5 Posts

December 2008

4 Posts